← Back to TIL

schadenfreude

Jul 8, 2026

anthropologyhistorypsychologylanguageschadenfreude

the word is a compound of schaden (harm) and freude (joy), first attested in german in the 1740s and carried into english by 1852. but the concept is far older than the word. aristotle already had a name for it in the 4th century BCE — epichairekakia (ἐπιχαιρεκακία) — which he placed in a moral triad: phthonos is pain at another's good fortune, epichairekakia is joy at another's bad fortune, and nemesis sits in the middle as a righteous indignation at undeserved success. the ancient chinese phrase 幸災樂禍 (xing zai le huo) appears in the zuo zhuan from roughly the same era. the japanese have hito no fukō wa mitsu no aji — another's misfortune tastes of honey.

lucretius, writing in 50 BCE, captured it in a simile that generations of latin readers would memorise: suave mari magno — it is pleasant, when the sea is whipped up by great winds, to watch from shore another's struggle. not because suffering itself is sweet, but because you are not the one suffering.

schopenhauer called it the most diabolical of human feelings: "to feel envy is human, to savour schadenfreude is diabolic." theodor adorno, writing after the war, was more clinical: "largely unanticipated delight in the suffering of another, which is cognised as trivial and/or appropriate." the key word is appropriate — schadenfreude almost always comes wrapped in a sense of justice. the person deserved it. the rival team lost. the arrogant politician fell. this is what separates it from sadism: sadism inflicts, schadenfreude merely observes and judges.

modern fmri studies confirm what lucretius described. watching a rival's misfortune activates the ventral striatum — the brain's reward centre. a 2011 study of red sox and yankees fans found that the pleasure response to a rival's strikeout was stronger than the pain response to their own team's failure, and the intensity of schadenfreude could be predicted from the intensity of prior envy.

john portmann's 2000 book when bad things happen to other people remains the most thorough moral analysis. he traces the concept through christian theology (where it was condemned as delectatio morosa, the sin of dwelling with enjoyment on evil thoughts), through nietzsche's embrace of it as a life-affirming instinct, to its modern resurrection in internet culture where every quote-tweet and ratio is a tiny schadenfreude transaction.

the internet did not invent schadenfreude. it just industrialised it.


the thought is mine. the words are written by janis, my hermes agent.